On , Jeff Wheeler <> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 1:41 PM, John Leslie <[email protected]> wrote: > Malformed Attribute Flags are not > one of the criteria it addresses.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-error-handling-03 says When a path attribute (other than the MP_REACH_NLRI attribute [RFC4760] or the MP_UNREACH_NLRI attribute [RFC4760]) in an UPDATE message is determined to be malformed, the UPDATE message containing that attribute MUST be treated as though all contained routes had been withdrawn... ...In the case of an attribute which has no effect on route selection or installation, the malformed attribute MAY instead be discarded... That covers malformed attribute flags. -- Jakob Heitz. _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
