On 16 Oct 2014, at 0:04, Christopher Morrow <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This practice, especially if/when it becomes more common, presents two >> challenges: >> 1. Large numbers of prefixes may show up in the global routing table. For >> instance, there is a number plan for all of the German government, which >> could potentially inject more than 5000 municipality prefixes into the >> global IPv6 routing table. > ok <1% growth. What do you mean? >> Ideally, a set of best practices would be developed that strike a good >> balance between the needs of large organizations and the needs of the global >> routing system, and allow everyone to predict the consequences of different >> kinds of behavior and thus avoid unpleasant surprises. > i feel like we sort of have that already, or we know how the global > table works and people live within those constraints. I've only heard from a few people who do this / want to do this so far, but from what I hear they really want some clarity in this area. Spending a lot of time and money to set all of this up and then discovering your prefixes are filtered is rather suboptimal. Iljitsch _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
