On 18/10/2014 05:58, Randy Bush wrote: > [ not pickin' on you, nick ] > > trying to find protein in this whole thread. > > in the long run, why will v6 not suffer the <your expletive about > reasons goes here> same deaggregation which is about half of the v4 > routing table?
I see no reason why it will be fundamentally different unless sites start using the multi-prefix model of addressing, which would change the game by allowing a site to be in multiple aggregates simultaneously. I don't know exactly what impact that would have, but it would change the game. Alternatively we could abolish capitalism. Brian > > maybe if we start filtering now. but we know how well that went in ipv4 > when their suits called our suits and said "we pay you to let us contact > <deaggregator>. > > 96 more bits, no magic (and 64 of those bits are allocated to relative > vacuum) > > randy > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
