> On Nov 19, 2016, at 10:10 AM, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Leave alone that this all makes sense to be sent well before the planned 
> admin shutdown so the other side is first aware of it and can manually or 
> automatically take users off that peering. 
> 
> But looks like we are light years away from such basic thing here .... 

That was part of my motivation about asking about the already-adopted Advisory 
draft still being relevant.  

The shutdown draft requires no changes for any useful backward compatibility.  
But in order to signal such other information, the routers in question would 
need to support Advisory.

Although, personally, I'd rather just get an email to my noc@ address than have 
to scrape my syslog that maintenance is about to occur unexpectedly.

-- Jeff

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to