On Dec 19, Nick Hilliard <[email protected]> wrote: > The reason that IXPs are disinclined to insert the rsasn in a route > server feed is that a route server attempts to replicate what you would > see if you had bilateral peering sessions to all other RS clients. If > the IXP operator inserts the rsasn, it's materially changing the bgp > feed and breaking the rough equivalence between bilateral and > multilateral peering. This is generally considered to be a bad thing, > both by IXPs and by IXP participants. I agree. I understand that Job's goal is to be able to identify the RSes in the path, and this can be done with much less operational troubles with a well known community.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
