Sounds good. Thank you so much for the discussions and info. Sriram
-----Original Message----- From: Ben Maddison <benm@workonline.africa> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2022 2:23 AM To: Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> Cc: Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) <kotikalapudi.sri...@nist.gov>; grow@ietf.org; sidr...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [GROW] IXP Route Server question Hi Sriram, On 03/10, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) wrote on 10/03/2022 03:31: [...] > > The ASPA verification draft treats the relationship of RS to > > RS-client as similar to that of Provider to Customer. Seems > > reasonable? The AS of an RS client includes the RS's AS in its ASPA > > as a "Provider". > > yes, this is reasonable. > Essential, I would think: how could a far end relying party know that an AS in the middle of a received AS_PATH is a non-transparent IXP RS in order to apply any other treatment? A special mark in the ASPA itself perhaps, but yuk ;-) Cheers, Ben _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
