Sounds good. Thank you so much for the discussions and info. Sriram
-----Original Message----- From: Ben Maddison <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2022 2:23 AM To: Nick Hilliard <[email protected]> Cc: Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [GROW] IXP Route Server question Hi Sriram, On 03/10, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) wrote on 10/03/2022 03:31: [...] > > The ASPA verification draft treats the relationship of RS to > > RS-client as similar to that of Provider to Customer. Seems > > reasonable? The AS of an RS client includes the RS's AS in its ASPA > > as a "Provider". > > yes, this is reasonable. > Essential, I would think: how could a far end relying party know that an AS in the middle of a received AS_PATH is a non-transparent IXP RS in order to apply any other treatment? A special mark in the ASPA itself perhaps, but yuk ;-) Cheers, Ben _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
