Dear GROW,

I support adoption. I think it is a very valuable extension of BMP. Enabling 
network operators to verify how the paths are being installed in RIB and 
consequently being able to verify redundancy.

Best wishes
Thomas

> On 30 Mar 2023, at 13:35, Job Snijders <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Dear GROW,
> 
> The authors of draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv asked whether GROW
> working group could consider adoption of the internet-draft.
> 
> This message is a request to the group for feedback on whether this
> internet-draft should be adopted.
> 
> Title: BMP Extension for Path Status TLV
> Abstract: 
>  The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) provides an interface for obtaining
>  BGP Path information. BGP Path Information is conveyed within BMP Route
>  Monitoring (RM) messages. This document proposes an extension to BMP to
>  convey the status of a path after being processed by the BGP process.
>  This extension makes use of the TLV mechanims described in
>  draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv and draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv-ebit.
> 
> The Internet-Draft can be found here:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-12.html
> 
> Please share with the mailing list if you are think this work should be
> adopted by GROW, willing to review and/or otherwise contribute to this
> draft!
> 
> WG Adoption call ends April 21th, 2023.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Job / Chris
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to