Hi all, I support adoption, this concept would offer very useful insights in both troubleshooting and general analysis of router behaviours.
Best, luuk On Thu 30 Mar 2023, 04:35, Job Snijders wrote: > Dear GROW, > > The authors of draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv asked whether GROW > working group could consider adoption of the internet-draft. > > This message is a request to the group for feedback on whether this > internet-draft should be adopted. > > Title: BMP Extension for Path Status TLV > Abstract: > The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) provides an interface for obtaining > BGP Path information. BGP Path Information is conveyed within BMP Route > Monitoring (RM) messages. This document proposes an extension to BMP to > convey the status of a path after being processed by the BGP process. > This extension makes use of the TLV mechanims described in > draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv and draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv-ebit. > > The Internet-Draft can be found here: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-12.html > > Please share with the mailing list if you are think this work should be > adopted by GROW, willing to review and/or otherwise contribute to this > draft! > > WG Adoption call ends April 21th, 2023. > > Kind regards, > > Job / Chris > > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
