Hi GROW,

I've noticed this errata report under discussion: 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/g1d3cJhNMuSnchQiqX0lkQCnQkk/
If GROW agrees that "the L flag is only applied to Route Monitoring messages", 
to distinguish between pre-policy statistics and post-policy statistics of the 
Adj-RIBs-In, I think the following types could be added for RIB-IN Statistics:

*  Type = TBD8: (64-bit Gauge) Number of routes in pre-policy Adj-RIBs-In.
*  Type = TBD9: (64-bit Gauge) Number of routes in post-policy Adj-RIBs-In.
*  Type = TBD10: Number of routes in per-AFI/SAFI pre-policy Adj-RIB-In.  The 
value is structured as: 2-byte Address Family Identifier (AFI), 1-byte 
Subsequent Address Family Identifier (SAFI), followed by a 64-bit Gauge.
*  Type = TBD11: Number of routes in per-AFI/SAFI post-policy Adj-RIB-In.  The 
value is structured as: 2-byte Address Family Identifier (AFI), 1-byte 
Subsequent Address Family Identifier (SAFI), followed by a 64-bit Gauge.

Waiting to hear your opinions, thanks.

Best regards,
Shunwan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: GROW [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Zhuangshunwan
> Sent: Saturday, December 9, 2023 3:15 PM
> To: Job Snijders <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [GROW] Working Group Call for
> draft-msri-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats (start 06/Dec/2023 end 06/Jan/2024)
> 
> 
> Hi Job, GROW,
> 
> I have read the draft and support its adoption.
> 
> Best regards,
> Shunwan
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: GROW [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Job Snijders
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 11:49 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [GROW] Working Group Call for
> > draft-msri-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats (start 06/Dec/2023 end 06/Jan/2024)
> >
> > Dear GROW,
> >
> > The author of draft-msri-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats asked whether the GROW
> > working group could consider adoption of their internet-draft.
> >
> > This message is a request to the group for feedback on whether this
> > internet-draft should be adopted.
> >
> > Title: Definition For New BMP Statistics Type
> > Abstract:
> >   RFC 7854 defined different BMP statistics messages types to observe
> >   interesting events that occur on the router.  This document updates
> >   RFC 7854 by adding new statistics type.
> >
> > The Internet-Draft can be found here:
> > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-msri-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats-00.h
> > tml
> >
> > *** NOTE *** This draft has nothing other than BMP code point requests
> > for counters. If adoption fails, the authors can go off an request FCFS
> instead.
> >
> > Please share with the mailing list if you would like this work to be
> > adopted by GROW, are willing to review and/or otherwise contribute to
> this draft!
> >
> > WG Adoption call ends January 6th, 2024.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Job / Chris
> > GROW co-chairs
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > GROW mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to