Hi Mukul,
I have read draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats-00 and I think the
description in your document is very clear and accurate. I think it's
great to explicitly define Stat Type 7 and Stat Type 9 as counters for
rib-in-pre-policy and also define counters for rib-in-post-policy.
Thanks,
Shunwan
*From:*Mukul Srivastava [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Friday, January 19, 2024 11:01 PM
*To:* Zhuangshunwan <[email protected]>; Job Snijders
<[email protected]>; [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [GROW] Working Group Call for
draft-msri-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats (start 06/Dec/2023 end 06/Jan/2024)
Hi Shunwan
I looked at your proposed counter and I feel that they are already
present in RFC 7854 for rib-in-pre-policy.
Copying it here from RFC 7854.
*4.8 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7854.html#section-4.8>. Stats
Reports*
o Stat Type = 7: (64-bit Gauge) Number of routes in Adj-RIBs-In.
o Stat Type = 9: Number of routes in per-AFI/SAFI Adj-RIB-In. The
value is structured as: 2-byte Address Family Identifier (AFI),
1-byte Subsequent Address Family Identifier (SAFI), followed by a
64-bit Gauge.
For rib-in-post-policy, we don’t have those counters and can be added. I
will add them.
Let me know if you have any further comments.
Thanks
Mukul
Juniper Business Use Only
*From: *Mukul Srivastava <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
*Date: *Wednesday, January 17, 2024 at 9:15 AM
*To: *Zhuangshunwan <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>, Job Snijders
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
*Subject: *Re: [GROW] Working Group Call for
draft-msri-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats (start 06/Dec/2023 end 06/Jan/2024)
Thanks for the comments. I will go over it and update docs accordingly.
Thanks
Mukul
*From: *GROW <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on
behalf of Zhuangshunwan <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*Date: *Saturday, December 9, 2023 at 3:27 AM
*To: *Zhuangshunwan <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>, Job Snijders
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
*Subject: *Re: [GROW] Working Group Call for
draft-msri-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats (start 06/Dec/2023 end 06/Jan/2024)
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Hi GROW,
I've noticed this errata report under discussion:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/g1d3cJhNMuSnchQiqX0lkQCnQkk/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GcBz8ozUcDW3DcFms2m15hiJUwCN7bBXSR3wS_UdvGYS603ApxdNMc2XqFW9jpNp1XgyHbKnvQqlauvtUtmAov7CA-Pm$ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/g1d3cJhNMuSnchQiqX0lkQCnQkk/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GcBz8ozUcDW3DcFms2m15hiJUwCN7bBXSR3wS_UdvGYS603ApxdNMc2XqFW9jpNp1XgyHbKnvQqlauvtUtmAov7CA-Pm$>
If GROW agrees that "the L flag is only applied to Route Monitoring
messages", to distinguish between pre-policy statistics and post-policy
statistics of the Adj-RIBs-In, I think the following types could be
added for RIB-IN Statistics:
* Type = TBD8: (64-bit Gauge) Number of routes in pre-policy Adj-RIBs-In.
* Type = TBD9: (64-bit Gauge) Number of routes in post-policy Adj-RIBs-In.
* Type = TBD10: Number of routes in per-AFI/SAFI pre-policy
Adj-RIB-In. The value is structured as: 2-byte Address Family
Identifier (AFI), 1-byte Subsequent Address Family Identifier (SAFI),
followed by a 64-bit Gauge.
* Type = TBD11: Number of routes in per-AFI/SAFI post-policy
Adj-RIB-In. The value is structured as: 2-byte Address Family
Identifier (AFI), 1-byte Subsequent Address Family Identifier (SAFI),
followed by a 64-bit Gauge.
Waiting to hear your opinions, thanks.
Best regards,
Shunwan
-----Original Message-----
From: GROW [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf
Of Zhuangshunwan
Sent: Saturday, December 9, 2023 3:15 PM
To: Job Snijders <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [GROW] Working Group Call for
draft-msri-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats (start 06/Dec/2023 end 06/Jan/2024)
Hi Job, GROW,
I have read the draft and support its adoption.
Best regards,
Shunwan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: GROW [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf
Of Job Snijders
> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 11:49 PM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: [GROW] Working Group Call for
> draft-msri-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats (start 06/Dec/2023 end 06/Jan/2024)
>
> Dear GROW,
>
> The author of draft-msri-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats asked whether the GROW
> working group could consider adoption of their internet-draft.
>
> This message is a request to the group for feedback on whether this
> internet-draft should be adopted.
>
> Title: Definition For New BMP Statistics Type
> Abstract:
> RFC 7854 defined different BMP statistics messages types to observe
> interesting events that occur on the router. This document updates
> RFC 7854 by adding new statistics type.
>
> The Internet-Draft can be found here:
>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-msri-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats-00.h__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GcBz8ozUcDW3DcFms2m15hiJUwCN7bBXSR3wS_UdvGYS603ApxdNMc2XqFW9jpNp1XgyHbKnvQqlauvtUtmAohLYbTUy$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-msri-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats-00.h__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GcBz8ozUcDW3DcFms2m15hiJUwCN7bBXSR3wS_UdvGYS603ApxdNMc2XqFW9jpNp1XgyHbKnvQqlauvtUtmAohLYbTUy$>
> tml
>
> *** NOTE *** This draft has nothing other than BMP code point requests
> for counters. If adoption fails, the authors can go off an request FCFS
instead.
>
> Please share with the mailing list if you would like this work to be
> adopted by GROW, are willing to review and/or otherwise contribute to
this draft!
>
> WG Adoption call ends January 6th, 2024.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Job / Chris
> GROW co-chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GcBz8ozUcDW3DcFms2m15hiJUwCN7bBXSR3wS_UdvGYS603ApxdNMc2XqFW9jpNp1XgyHbKnvQqlauvtUtmAolGoROJy$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GcBz8ozUcDW3DcFms2m15hiJUwCN7bBXSR3wS_UdvGYS603ApxdNMc2XqFW9jpNp1XgyHbKnvQqlauvtUtmAolGoROJy$>
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GcBz8ozUcDW3DcFms2m15hiJUwCN7bBXSR3wS_UdvGYS603ApxdNMc2XqFW9jpNp1XgyHbKnvQqlauvtUtmAolGoROJy$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GcBz8ozUcDW3DcFms2m15hiJUwCN7bBXSR3wS_UdvGYS603ApxdNMc2XqFW9jpNp1XgyHbKnvQqlauvtUtmAolGoROJy$>
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GcBz8ozUcDW3DcFms2m15hiJUwCN7bBXSR3wS_UdvGYS603ApxdNMc2XqFW9jpNp1XgyHbKnvQqlauvtUtmAolGoROJy$
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GcBz8ozUcDW3DcFms2m15hiJUwCN7bBXSR3wS_UdvGYS603ApxdNMc2XqFW9jpNp1XgyHbKnvQqlauvtUtmAolGoROJy$>
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
