On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 09:11:12PM -0600, David Farmer wrote: > If you keep it as updating RFC 7454, I believe you need to say it does > so in the abstract. Also, somewhere in the document, probably in the > introduction, you need to explain how it updates RFC 7454, that is how > this document relates to RFC 7454.
Thanks David, that's how I understand the process too. If the contents of draft-ietf-grow-as-path-prepending actually update 7454 (which currently doesn't seem the case), the working group has to think about how that aligns with the 'big update' of 7454 happening in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-bgpopsecupd/ Kind regards, Job _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
