Dear Mohamed,
> [Med] You can delete that paragraph from Section 6 but update Section
> 2, e.g., as follows:
> 
> OLD:
> 
> Instead, operators
>    are advised to consult applicable documentation and contemporary
>    informational documents describing implementation specifics.
> 
> NEW:
> 
>    Instead, operators
>    are advised to consult applicable documentation and contemporary
>    informational documents describing implementation specifics (e.g.,
>    [I-D.ietf-grow-routing-ops-sec-inform] and [I-D.ietf-grow-routing-
> ops-terms]).
> > 

Thank you for providing more detailed instructions on the changes you
want to see implemented. I will of course implement that change
immediately.

However, would you mind sharing the reasoning behind your decision?
Taking the path of documenting technical guidance and terminology in I-
Ds and leveraging the expiration feature to ensure that we do not end
up in a situation where we have stale technical guidance again had been
discussed for over a year in GROW now.

Of course, I do not want to question your authority here; Instead, I
assume that you accounted for several considerations I may not even be
aware of. As such, I believe that sharing further details would
tremendously help me improve personally and be a more effective
contributor on team outputs in the future.

With best regards,
Tobias


-- 
Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig
T +31 616 80 98 99
M [email protected]
Pronouns: he/him/his

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to