Dear Authors, Thanks for the update! One comment: According to the latest documentation, how do implementers know that the Path Status TLV needs to carry an index?
Best Regards, Shunwan > -----Original Message----- > From: Camilo Cardona [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2025 6:15 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [GROW] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-03.txt > > Hello grow, > > Here is a summary of the changes for this version of the bmp path marking > draft. > > - Incorporated editorial improvements, with thanks to Med for many > suggestions. > - Removed content redundant with the TLV and ebit drafts. > - Added a section discussing churn, in response to Jeff’s comments. Since use > cases vary, the draft doesnt provide a solution, but explains the potential > impact and possible mitigations. Also, updated the handling of unmarked > paths to recommend explicitly marking them since it was discussed how an > implementation might not include the TLV until it considered appropriate to > reduce churn. > - Added a section on path status consistency, discussing how actul > implementations might diverge from the standard definitions; this will require > further discussion in how detailed we should be. > - Added security considerations. > > Please reach out for any suggestions. > > Thanks, > Authors > > > On 23 Apr 2025, at 17:08, [email protected] wrote: > > > > Internet-Draft draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-03.txt is now available. > > It is a work item of the Global Routing Operations (GROW) WG of the IETF. > > > > Title: BMP Extension for Path Status TLV > > Authors: Camilo Cardona > > Paolo Lucente > > Pierre Francois > > Yunan Gu > > Thomas Graf > > Name: draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-03.txt > > Pages: 12 > > Dates: 2025-04-23 > > > > Abstract: > > > > The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) provides an interface for obtaining > > BGP path information, which is is conveyed through BMP Route > > Monitoring (RM) messages. This document specifies a BMP extension to > > convey the status of a path after being processed by the BGP process. > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv/ > > > > There is also an HTMLized version available at: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-03 > > > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > > > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv > -03 > > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at: > > rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > GROW mailing list -- [email protected] > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
