Hi Camilo,

> 
> Do you mean the index field from the general TLV header described in
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv?
>
Yes. Thank you for your pointer! Now I understand that the Common TLV Header is 
as follows:
   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |        Type (2 octets)  |     Length (2 octets)          |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |G|      Index (15 bits)  |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
I have no further questions now.

Thanks,
Shunwan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Camilo Cardona [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2025 10:06 PM
> To: Zhuangshunwan <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-03.txt
> 
> Hello Shunwan,
> 
> Do you mean the index field from the general TLV header described in
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv?
> 
> Thanks,
> Camilo C
> 
> > On 23 Apr 2025, at 21:58, Zhuangshunwan <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Authors,
> >
> > Thanks for the update!
> > One comment: According to the latest documentation, how do implementers
> know that the Path Status TLV needs to carry an index?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Shunwan
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Camilo Cardona [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2025 6:15 AM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: [GROW] Re: I-D Action:
> >> draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-03.txt
> >>
> >> Hello grow,
> >>
> >> Here is a summary of the changes for this version of the  bmp path
> >> marking draft.
> >>
> >> - Incorporated editorial improvements, with thanks to Med for many
> >> suggestions.
> >> - Removed content redundant with the TLV and ebit drafts.
> >> - Added a section discussing churn, in response to Jeff’s comments.
> >> Since use cases vary, the draft doesnt provide a solution, but
> >> explains the potential impact and possible mitigations. Also, updated
> >> the handling of unmarked paths to recommend explicitly marking them
> >> since it was discussed how an implementation might not include the
> >> TLV until it considered appropriate to reduce churn.
> >> - Added a section on path status consistency, discussing how actul
> >> implementations might diverge from the standard definitions; this
> >> will require further discussion in how detailed we should be.
> >> - Added security considerations.
> >>
> >> Please reach out for any suggestions.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Authors
> >>
> >>> On 23 Apr 2025, at 17:08, [email protected] wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-03.txt is now
> available.
> >>> It is a work item of the Global Routing Operations (GROW) WG of the IETF.
> >>>
> >>>  Title:   BMP Extension for Path Status TLV
> >>>  Authors: Camilo Cardona
> >>>           Paolo Lucente
> >>>           Pierre Francois
> >>>           Yunan Gu
> >>>           Thomas Graf
> >>>  Name:    draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-03.txt
> >>>  Pages:   12
> >>>  Dates:   2025-04-23
> >>>
> >>> Abstract:
> >>>
> >>>  The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) provides an interface for
> >>> obtaining  BGP path information, which is is conveyed through BMP
> >>> Route  Monitoring (RM) messages.  This document specifies a BMP
> >>> extension to  convey the status of a path after being processed by the
> BGP process.
> >>>
> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tl
> >>> v/
> >>>
> >>> There is also an HTMLized version available at:
> >>>
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-markin
> >> g-tlv-03
> >>>
> >>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> >>>
> >> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-ma
> >> rking-tlv
> >> -03
> >>>
> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
> >>> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> GROW mailing list -- [email protected]
> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> GROW mailing list -- [email protected]
> >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to