Hello Shunwan, Do you mean the index field from the general TLV header described in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv?
Thanks, Camilo C > On 23 Apr 2025, at 21:58, Zhuangshunwan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Authors, > > Thanks for the update! > One comment: According to the latest documentation, how do implementers know > that the Path Status TLV needs to carry an index? > > Best Regards, > Shunwan > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Camilo Cardona [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2025 6:15 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [GROW] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-03.txt >> >> Hello grow, >> >> Here is a summary of the changes for this version of the bmp path marking >> draft. >> >> - Incorporated editorial improvements, with thanks to Med for many >> suggestions. >> - Removed content redundant with the TLV and ebit drafts. >> - Added a section discussing churn, in response to Jeff’s comments. Since use >> cases vary, the draft doesnt provide a solution, but explains the potential >> impact and possible mitigations. Also, updated the handling of unmarked >> paths to recommend explicitly marking them since it was discussed how an >> implementation might not include the TLV until it considered appropriate to >> reduce churn. >> - Added a section on path status consistency, discussing how actul >> implementations might diverge from the standard definitions; this will >> require >> further discussion in how detailed we should be. >> - Added security considerations. >> >> Please reach out for any suggestions. >> >> Thanks, >> Authors >> >>> On 23 Apr 2025, at 17:08, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-03.txt is now available. >>> It is a work item of the Global Routing Operations (GROW) WG of the IETF. >>> >>> Title: BMP Extension for Path Status TLV >>> Authors: Camilo Cardona >>> Paolo Lucente >>> Pierre Francois >>> Yunan Gu >>> Thomas Graf >>> Name: draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-03.txt >>> Pages: 12 >>> Dates: 2025-04-23 >>> >>> Abstract: >>> >>> The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) provides an interface for obtaining >>> BGP path information, which is is conveyed through BMP Route >>> Monitoring (RM) messages. This document specifies a BMP extension to >>> convey the status of a path after being processed by the BGP process. >>> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv/ >>> >>> There is also an HTMLized version available at: >>> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-03 >>> >>> A diff from the previous version is available at: >>> >> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv >> -03 >>> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at: >>> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> GROW mailing list -- [email protected] >>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> GROW mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
