Also what's the platform requirement? I think these numbers are from Linux...
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017, 08:53 'Carl Mastrangelo' via grpc.io < grpc-io@googlegroups.com> wrote: > It is if you optimize your code. What kind of latency / throughput > numbers are in your requirements? > > > On Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 2:34:41 AM UTC-8, Peter Tiedemann wrote: > > But do you mean if i optimize *my* code, or if someone optimizes the > *grpc* C# code base? > > I am naturally concerned with how high priority .Net support has for grpc, > as that is our primary platform :) > > On Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 12:48:26 AM UTC+1, Carl Mastrangelo wrote: > > It is a good indication of what you can get, if you optimize your code. I > think a better idea of performance is the latency, because that tends to > matter a lot more for most applications. For that they are on par. > > On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 6:13:21 AM UTC-8, p...@configit.com > wrote: > > But if the benchmark is a good indication of real world throughput, then > surely there is still reason to be concerned? Or do you mean that the > benchmark specific Java code (as in the benchmark application ) has been > optimized? > > On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 1:30:37 AM UTC+1, Carl Mastrangelo wrote: > > The reason Java is fast is because there has been a lot more time spent in > making the *benchmark* fast. Those numbers tell you what you can expect > from an optimized gRPC server / client. The core reason Java is faster is > likely because there was considerable time put into profiling that > benchmark code. > > On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 9:57:06 AM UTC-8, Peter Tiedemann wrote: > > I was looking over the benchmarks here (1.0.0, master does not seem to > work): > > > https://performance-dot-grpc-testing.appspot.com/explore?dashboard=5712453606309888 > > Mostly, it seems sensible enough, C++ is fastest, Java and C# roughly > tied. Then i took a look at the throughput tests, where Java shows ~10x > more QPS, leaving C# closer to Python and Node. > > Is there some performance issue with the C# implementation i need to be > aware of? > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups " > grpc.io" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to grpc-io+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to grpc-io@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/grpc-io. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/9d3b7f37-16b6-493b-a644-6a26f83aad35%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/9d3b7f37-16b6-493b-a644-6a26f83aad35%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "grpc.io" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to grpc-io+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to grpc-io@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/grpc-io. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/CAOWnRi9HSq9C-75jkc7-JrTLQQ5i9GptwkR%2B-mSHKahAbyWh7g%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
