The numbers are based on .NET Core (CoreCLR) on Linux because that's where the future of .NET is and that's what we are trying to optimize for. Also, expect to see better numbers for Linux than Windows (Linux performance optimization is where we have the most experience & momentum).
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Peter Tiedemann <[email protected]> wrote: > Primarily windows, but very soon also Linux via .Net Core. I guess these > numbers might be based on Mono? > > On Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 6:19:15 PM UTC+1, Nicolas Noble wrote: >> >> Also what's the platform requirement? I think these numbers are from >> Linux... >> >> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017, 08:53 'Carl Mastrangelo' via grpc.io < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It is if you optimize your code. What kind of latency / throughput >>> numbers are in your requirements? >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 2:34:41 AM UTC-8, Peter Tiedemann >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> But do you mean if i optimize *my* code, or if someone optimizes the >>>> *grpc* C# code base? >>>> >>>> I am naturally concerned with how high priority .Net support has for >>>> grpc, as that is our primary platform :) >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 12:48:26 AM UTC+1, Carl Mastrangelo >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> It is a good indication of what you can get, if you optimize your >>>>> code. I think a better idea of performance is the latency, because that >>>>> tends to matter a lot more for most applications. For that they are on >>>>> par. >>>>> >>>>> On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 6:13:21 AM UTC-8, [email protected] >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> But if the benchmark is a good indication of real world throughput, >>>>>> then surely there is still reason to be concerned? Or do you mean that >>>>>> the >>>>>> benchmark specific Java code (as in the benchmark application ) has been >>>>>> optimized? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 1:30:37 AM UTC+1, Carl Mastrangelo >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The reason Java is fast is because there has been a lot more time >>>>>>> spent in making the *benchmark* fast. Those numbers tell you what you >>>>>>> can >>>>>>> expect from an optimized gRPC server / client. The core reason Java is >>>>>>> faster is likely because there was considerable time put into profiling >>>>>>> that benchmark code. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 9:57:06 AM UTC-8, Peter Tiedemann >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I was looking over the benchmarks here (1.0.0, master does not seem >>>>>>>> to work): >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://performance-dot-grpc-testing.appspot.com/explore?das >>>>>>>> hboard=5712453606309888 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mostly, it seems sensible enough, C++ is fastest, Java and C# >>>>>>>> roughly tied. Then i took a look at the throughput tests, where Java >>>>>>>> shows >>>>>>>> ~10x more QPS, leaving C# closer to Python and Node. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there some performance issue with the C# implementation i need >>>>>>>> to be aware of? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "grpc.io" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/grpc-io. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms >>> gid/grpc-io/9d3b7f37-16b6-493b-a644-6a26f83aad35%40googlegroups.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/9d3b7f37-16b6-493b-a644-6a26f83aad35%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups " > grpc.io" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/grpc-io. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/grpc-io/ec7f242f-9d9d-4dac-a2f8-6f138f597956%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/ec7f242f-9d9d-4dac-a2f8-6f138f597956%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "grpc.io" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/grpc-io. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/CACF4M0QdME_-Acsaphz8%3DekRm7Dap83WFBAi2GSYFPyZNYqTfw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
