"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thursday 24 January 2008 13:39, Robert Millan wrote: >> So perhaps it's a good idea to release 1.96 with known regressions after >> all. > > I think that would be a nicer approach at this stage. Anyway, nobody expects > that GRUB 2 is rock-solid (am I wrong?), so it would be more convenient for > the development to have a release frequently.
Agreed. Often, people just use a release instead of CVS and report bugs. It would be better for us if newer versions were tested. Perhaps nightly snapshots would be nice, if there was an easy way to set this up... -- Marco _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
