"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Friday 25 January 2008 09:56, Marco Gerards wrote: >> "Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > On Thursday 24 January 2008 13:39, Robert Millan wrote: >> >> So perhaps it's a good idea to release 1.96 with known regressions after >> >> all. >> > >> > I think that would be a nicer approach at this stage. Anyway, nobody >> > expects that GRUB 2 is rock-solid (am I wrong?), so it would be more >> > convenient for the development to have a release frequently. >> >> Agreed. Often, people just use a release instead of CVS and report >> bugs. It would be better for us if newer versions were tested. >> Perhaps nightly snapshots would be nice, if there was an easy way to >> set this up... > > I have heard that savannah hackers can set up a nightly snapshot, so I can > ask > them, if you really want.
Please do! :-) > So, for the next release, I will make it in next weekend (on the 2nd or the > 3rd), if nobody objects. Meanwhile, if you know user-visible changes which > are not written in NEWS yet, please fill them up in that file. I will go over the ChangeLog to see if more has to be added. -- Marco _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
