On Friday 25 January 2008 09:56, Marco Gerards wrote: > "Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Thursday 24 January 2008 13:39, Robert Millan wrote: > >> So perhaps it's a good idea to release 1.96 with known regressions after > >> all. > > > > I think that would be a nicer approach at this stage. Anyway, nobody > > expects that GRUB 2 is rock-solid (am I wrong?), so it would be more > > convenient for the development to have a release frequently. > > Agreed. Often, people just use a release instead of CVS and report > bugs. It would be better for us if newer versions were tested. > Perhaps nightly snapshots would be nice, if there was an easy way to > set this up...
I have heard that savannah hackers can set up a nightly snapshot, so I can ask them, if you really want. So, for the next release, I will make it in next weekend (on the 2nd or the 3rd), if nobody objects. Meanwhile, if you know user-visible changes which are not written in NEWS yet, please fill them up in that file. Okuji _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
