Jeroen Asselman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, I also made a diff available against 0.92. These are actually > allready getting rather large (around 500 k compressed). So there is > not that much benefit.
That's probably because you used -N with diff. This shouldn't be necessary, ATM. You should also exclude the CVS directories. I've made a patch against the last available version from CVS and the bzip2'd patch was only 70KB small. I used "cvs rdiff -ur V-0-92 gtk-gnutella-current" to create the patch. But always patching against the same old version will become a PITA and, of course, the patch will grow - especially with new files in CVS. Does anyone know a good and trustful CVS hoster where gtk-gnutella could be mirrored? Even, if Sourceforge solved the current problem, it's unlikely that such problems will not reappear and increase, IMHO. The patch can be downloaded here: http://sf.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=762158&group_id=4467&atid=304467 -- Christian
Jeroen Asselman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, I also made a diff available against 0.92. These are actually > allready getting rather large (around 500 k compressed). So there is > not that much benefit. That's probably because you used -N with diff. This shouldn't be necessary, ATM. You should also exclude the CVS directories. I've made a patch against the last available version from CVS and the bzip2'd patch was only 70KB small. I used "cvs rdiff -ur V-0-92 gtk-gnutella-current" to create the patch. But always patching against the same old version will become a PITA and, of course, the patch will grow - especially with new files in CVS. Does anyone know a good and trustful CVS hoster where gtk-gnutella could be mirrored? Even, if Sourceforge solved the current problem, it's unlikely that such problems will not reappear and increase, IMHO. -- Christian
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
