Jeroen Asselman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> OK, I also made a diff available against 0.92. These are actually
> allready getting rather large (around 500 k compressed). So there is
> not that much benefit.

That's probably because you used -N with diff. This shouldn't be
necessary, ATM. You should also exclude the CVS directories.
I've made a patch against the last available version from CVS
and the bzip2'd patch was only 70KB small.

I used "cvs rdiff -ur V-0-92 gtk-gnutella-current" to create the
patch.

But always patching against the same old version will become a PITA and,
of course, the patch will grow - especially with new files in CVS.

Does anyone know a good and trustful CVS hoster where gtk-gnutella
could be mirrored? Even, if Sourceforge solved the current problem, it's
unlikely that such problems will not reappear and increase, IMHO.

-- 
Christian

Attachment: current-2003-06-28.patch.bz2
Description: Binary data

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to