Ok, you win. I just did't know how to answer these questions correcly. So what I should answer them as?
1. Controls 2. Same as above (except on the Gtk#) 3. MIT X11 4. Same as above (except on the Gtk#) 5. Controls Jesus bless you, Víctor Rafael Rivarola 2005/12/15, Todd Berman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Holy Crap. > > Ok. > > Give me second while I wade in here with the clue-bat. > > > #1) MD is not strictly GPL. > > #2) MD is strictly GPL #D code and MIT X11 new code. > > #3) The dock is based on an GPL library, that can be relicensed to the > MIT X11 for us. (Jeroen, if I am wrong, feel free to beat me). In fact, > we should hunt this down and get it fixed up if it is possible, see > point #6. > > #4) This 'Novell license' is the MIT X11 license, the only mention of > Novell is in the copyright, because it is code written by Lluis as a > Novell employee, so Novell owns the copyright. The code is still MIT > X11. > > #5) SWF controls are not easy/helpful to port to gtk# in all honesty. In > fact, they suck to port. Everything is pretty different, and you don't > want to use System.Drawing on Linux if you can use Cairo directly (imo), > and even if you did, its still not a good path to rainbows and puppies. > > #6) I have no idea what license the data grid is under, but if it is not > MIT X11, it will have to be removed from MD with a quickness. If Daniel > can relicense it, great, if he cant/wont, then its toast, we *DO NOT* > want to push any license but the MIT X11. > > #7) Mike Kestner is my personal savior. He wrote, maintains, and rocks > out (with his cock out) all over gtk#. > > #8) Whatever widget library you wonderful people cook up will most > likely never be put into gtk# itself. This has been the stance in the > past w/ gtk#, and is a sane one. gtk# is a wrapper for gtk+, not a > wrapper + extension + other cool widgets. Another library would be a > great place for other cool widgets. Now. That said, a single widget > library to rule them all is a bad idea. As a developer, I want > copy/pastable code. I want to include your source into my app. That > makes it easy to update, and easy to deploy. It makes me feel warm, and > well loved. > > #9) Please dont use the Gtk.Controls namespace. Use a new toplevel, like > the rest of gtk#. > > #10) As far as looking for widgets for this library, all of > MonoDevelop.Components is pretty slick awesomeness. > > Anyway. This conversation looked like it was going nowhere relatively > quickly, and with near terminal velocity. Hopefully some of these points > can clear some things up. And the other ones that are clearly my opinion > can just be taken as words of advice from someone who has been writing > gtk# applications for the last 2 years. (Holy crap, Pedro and I did > start hacking on MD 2 years ago). > > --Todd > > On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 22:36 -0300, Victor Rafael Rivarola Soerensen > (FANATICO y LOCO por Cristo) wrote: > > Sorry Mike, its just that I have never hard from you before (that I > > remember), and I was surprisd to see Daniel mention you. I thought > > that he was doing it by mistake, he obvously knew you. > > > > Jesus bless you all, > > > > Víctor Rafael Rivarola > > > > 2005/12/14, Victor Rafael Rivarola Soerensen (FANATICO y LOCO por > > Cristo) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Ok, I received this from the "Daniel Morgan" <monodanmorg AT > > > yahoo.com> on the MonoDevelop list: > > > > > > > The source to the gtk# datagrid I posted can be licensed under the GNU > > > > LGPL license. I > > > > put Kris's name in the Author because I took source code from a > > > > TreeView sample found > > > > in gtk-sharp. > > > > > > > > I can't do anything about code in MonoDevelop because Chris took the > > > > datagrid from an > > > > old sqlsharpgtk and put it into MD. He fixed some stuff in the MD > > > > version. Since MD is > > > > licensed under the very strict GPL, I would not use the data grid from > > > > MD as your source. > > > > > > > > Either use the datagrid I posted on the list or from sqlsharpgtk. Both > > > > can be licensed > > > > under the LGPL. > > > > > > > > Some questions for Mike Kestner: > > > > What license does GTK# fall under? MIT X11 or LGPL? > > > > What license does the samples in gtk-sharp release tarball fall under? > > > > MIT X11 or > > > > LGPL? Or are samples in the public domain? > > > > > > I do not know who Mike Kestner is nor did I mention him in any of my > > > mails (I checked), but Daniel has a point there: if final intention is > > > an adoption by Gtk#, we better stick with the LGPL. > > > > > > Jesus bless you all, > > > > > > Víctor Rafael Rivarola > > > > > > -- > > > FANÁTICO > > > "Por cuanto eres tibio, y no frío ni caliente, te vomitaré de mi boca." > > > Apocalipsis 3:16 > > > > > > LOCO > > > "Porque la Palabra de la Cruz es locura para los que se pierden; pero a > > > los que se salvan, esto es, a nosotros, es poder de Dios." > > > 1 Corintios 1:18 > > > > > > > > > -- > > FANÁTICO > > "Por cuanto eres tibio, y no frío ni caliente, te vomitaré de mi boca." > > Apocalipsis 3:16 > > > > LOCO > > "Porque la Palabra de la Cruz es locura para los que se pierden; pero a > > los que se salvan, esto es, a nosotros, es poder de Dios." > > 1 Corintios 1:18 > > _______________________________________________ > > Gtk-sharp-list maillist - [email protected] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gtk-sharp-list > > -- FANÁTICO "Por cuanto eres tibio, y no frío ni caliente, te vomitaré de mi boca." Apocalipsis 3:16 LOCO "Porque la Palabra de la Cruz es locura para los que se pierden; pero a los que se salvan, esto es, a nosotros, es poder de Dios." 1 Corintios 1:18 _______________________________________________ Gtk-sharp-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gtk-sharp-list
