Hi, Todd Berman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > #9) Please dont use the Gtk.Controls namespace. Use a new toplevel, like > > > the rest of gtk#.
Gennadiy Donchyts replyed: > > Yes, I see that it makes no sence now. And in this case it makes even more > > sense to have a > > higher level widgets library since Gtk# is supposed to be as close to Gtk+ > > as possible? And > > our subj. is something .NET-stylish, ... and it should be separate for sure. > > > > Some guesses/votes: > > > > 1. Gwl (Gtk# Widgets Library), ... NGwl ;) > > 2. Some short name like nice used for other mono libraries. > > 3. ?? And I suggested: > 4. Controls 5. Widgets 6. GTKWidgets 7. GTKWidgetsLibrary 8. ControlsLibrary 9. GTKControlsLibrary I like Gennadiy's first suggestion: Gwl. It is really short. However, I don't feel it fits into Mono's naming scheme, as it is too cryptic. Jesus bless you all, Víctor Rafael Rivarola -- FANÁTICO "Por cuanto eres tibio, y no frío ni caliente, te vomitaré de mi boca." Apocalipsis 3:16 LOCO "Porque la Palabra de la Cruz es locura para los que se pierden; pero a los que se salvan, esto es, a nosotros, es poder de Dios." 1 Corintios 1:18 _______________________________________________ Gtk-sharp-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gtk-sharp-list
