On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 22:50 +0200, Armin Burgmeier wrote: > Yes. We will have to think of a naming convention for those binaries. > gtkmm-2.4-vc9.dll? (in contrast to gtkmm-2.4.dll for VS 2005, which we > might then rename to gtkmm-2.4-vc8.dll, possibly breaking compatibility)
Did Cedric's old installer have a VS2005 build, or just a VS2003 one? > But I'm still not 100% convinced. Do other C++ projects that provide > Windows binaries also ship different DLLs for each Visual Studio > Version? Yes, I'd like to do what's normal, though I can't think of anything to look at. But in the end we must do what people need. It looks like Qt only provide a MinGW build (not even any binaries) though that is not clear: http://trolltech.com/downloads/opensource/appdev > > And please make sure that those improvements are in the wiki, if Philip > > doesn't do that. > > Armin > -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
