On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 06:15 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 22:50 +0200, Armin Burgmeier wrote: > > Yes. We will have to think of a naming convention for those binaries. > > gtkmm-2.4-vc9.dll? (in contrast to gtkmm-2.4.dll for VS 2005, which we > > might then rename to gtkmm-2.4-vc8.dll, possibly breaking compatibility) > > Did Cedric's old installer have a VS2005 build, or just a VS2003 one?
It contained only a VS2005 one (and one for MinGW). > > But I'm still not 100% convinced. Do other C++ projects that provide > > Windows binaries also ship different DLLs for each Visual Studio > > Version? > > Yes, I'd like to do what's normal, though I can't think of anything to > look at. But in the end we must do what people need. > > It looks like Qt only provide a MinGW build (not even any binaries) > though that is not clear: > http://trolltech.com/downloads/opensource/appdev I'm going to add VS 2008 projects to SVN and corresponding binaries to the installers in the next few days. Armin _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list