On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 11:40 +0200, Armin Burgmeier wrote: > On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 06:15 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 22:50 +0200, Armin Burgmeier wrote: > > > Yes. We will have to think of a naming convention for those binaries. > > > gtkmm-2.4-vc9.dll? (in contrast to gtkmm-2.4.dll for VS 2005, which we > > > might then rename to gtkmm-2.4-vc8.dll, possibly breaking compatibility) > > > > Did Cedric's old installer have a VS2005 build, or just a VS2003 one? > > It contained only a VS2005 one (and one for MinGW). > > > > But I'm still not 100% convinced. Do other C++ projects that provide > > > Windows binaries also ship different DLLs for each Visual Studio > > > Version? > > > > Yes, I'd like to do what's normal, though I can't think of anything to > > look at. But in the end we must do what people need. > > > > It looks like Qt only provide a MinGW build (not even any binaries) > > though that is not clear: > > http://trolltech.com/downloads/opensource/appdev > > I'm going to add VS 2008 projects to SVN and corresponding binaries to > the installers in the next few days.
I recently uploaded revision 3 of the 2.14.1 installers [1]. They contain DLLs for both MSVC 2005 and MSVC 2008. They also fix the problem with the uninstaller not properly removing start menu items of user-local installations. There might also be new problems because of the DLL renames, although I hope there aren't. Armin [1] ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/binaries/win32/gtkmm/2.14/ _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
