On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 18:44 +0100, Chris Vine wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:19:49 +0200 > Germán Diago <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello. I'm looking for c++ bindings for dbus in gnome. I would like > > to know which > > of these bindings I should use. > > For what I saw it looks like dbus-cxx is better mantained. Is > > dbus-c++ still actively mantained? Are they usable for real projects? > > Thanks in advance. _______________________________________________ > > gtkmm-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list > > Finger trouble. What I meant to say was: > > Presumably the next glibmm release will wrap GDBus, which seems the > best target to aim for if you can wait for it.
Actually, it would be great if someone could look at that. Thanks to Jose, we now have Glib::Variant, wrapping GVariant, which it uses. These links seems to be relevant: http://library.gnome.org/devel/gio/unstable/gdbus-lowlevel.html http://library.gnome.org/devel/gio/unstable/gdbus-convenience.html Maybe we should start by wrapping this: http://library.gnome.org/devel/gio/unstable/GDBusConnection.html and this: http://library.gnome.org/devel/gio/unstable/GDBusMessage.html -- [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
