On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 21:05 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 18:44 +0100, Chris Vine wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:19:49 +0200 > > Germán Diago <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello. I'm looking for c++ bindings for dbus in gnome. I would like > > > to know which > > > of these bindings I should use. > > > For what I saw it looks like dbus-cxx is better mantained. Is > > > dbus-c++ still actively mantained? Are they usable for real projects? > > > Thanks in advance. _______________________________________________ > > > gtkmm-list mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list > > > > Finger trouble. What I meant to say was: > > > > Presumably the next glibmm release will wrap GDBus, which seems the > > best target to aim for if you can wait for it. > > Actually, it would be great if someone could look at that. Thanks to > Jose, we now have Glib::Variant, wrapping GVariant, which it uses. > > These links seems to be relevant: > http://library.gnome.org/devel/gio/unstable/gdbus-lowlevel.html > http://library.gnome.org/devel/gio/unstable/gdbus-convenience.html > > Maybe we should start by wrapping this: > http://library.gnome.org/devel/gio/unstable/GDBusConnection.html > and this: > http://library.gnome.org/devel/gio/unstable/GDBusMessage.html
We have now wrapped much of the new glib DBus API in glibmm, though there's probably still lots to do. It would be great it someone played with it a bit, or even tried to write some example code. Otherwise, I fear that it might not be ready in time for the stable release. -- [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
