El Sep 2, 2010, a las 3:48 AM, Murray Cumming <[email protected]> escribió:
> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 21:05 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: >> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 18:44 +0100, Chris Vine wrote: >>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:19:49 +0200 >>> Germán Diago <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hello. I'm looking for c++ bindings for dbus in gnome. I would like >>>> to know which >>>> of these bindings I should use. >>>> For what I saw it looks like dbus-cxx is better mantained. Is >>>> dbus-c++ still actively mantained? Are they usable for real projects? >>>> Thanks in advance. _______________________________________________ >>>> gtkmm-list mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list >>> >>> Finger trouble. What I meant to say was: >>> >>> Presumably the next glibmm release will wrap GDBus, which seems the >>> best target to aim for if you can wait for it. >> >> Actually, it would be great if someone could look at that. Thanks to >> Jose, we now have Glib::Variant, wrapping GVariant, which it uses. >> >> These links seems to be relevant: >> http://library.gnome.org/devel/gio/unstable/gdbus-lowlevel.html >> http://library.gnome.org/devel/gio/unstable/gdbus-convenience.html >> >> Maybe we should start by wrapping this: >> http://library.gnome.org/devel/gio/unstable/GDBusConnection.html >> and this: >> http://library.gnome.org/devel/gio/unstable/GDBusMessage.html > > We have now wrapped much of the new glib DBus API in glibmm, though > there's probably still lots to do. It would be great it someone played > with it a bit, or even tried to write some example code. Otherwise, I > fear that it might not be ready in time for the stable release. > While others test what's already there, I'd happily add more of what's missing if that's okay. --José > _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
