Barry:

Man, it's good to hear from you again. I've been off the FJ list for some
time now. I've been walking the Appalachain Trail and haven't been riding
much but my toes and knees got real sore (after 571 miles) so I'm home for a
while.

Guess I'll sell the FJ and possibly get a GTS. Time to try a different bike,
I guess. hate to let the FJ go but don't ride one very much, let alone two.

Several people on the list have offered to let me ride a GTS and that will
tell the story.

Good to hear from you,
----- Original Message -----
From: "Barry Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: Information


> Bill
>
> I faced the very same decision a month ago. I wanted a bike for two-up
> touring. My FJ had been cut and carved about and no longer had pillion
> footpegs, so I was considering the FJR.
>
> My wife who has quite long legs found the FJR cramped on the back, with
the
> upswept exhausts forcing her legs up and bending her knees too much for
long
> distance stuff.
>
> I then looked around and remembered the GTS. As one does in these
> situations, one seeks the advice of those who know better. I joined this
> list, asked lots of annoying questions, made my decision and bought a GTS.
>
> It's so unique, so individual. The best and only advice really is 'get
your
> leg over one'. I reckon it will take you 30 seconds to know if it's for
you
> or not !
>
>
>
> Barry Edwards
> GTS1000 '95
> FJ1200 '90
> YZF1000R '98
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 7:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Information
>
>
> > Thanks Phil:
> > It's good to hear what is really going on out there. I agree on the GTS
> and
> > as I said to Kevin hawkins earlier, what ever I get will probably be my
> last
> > bike so I would like to make it unique.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Phil Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:37 AM
> > Subject: Re: Information
> >
> >
> > > Let's see.....first, you say the FJR1300 is coming our way.  Don't bet
> on
> > > it at all if you're in the U.S.  Yamaha has indicated clearly they
don't
> > > intend to market in the U.S.  The rumor that Yamaha gave dealers their
> > > blessing to take deposits is just that, rumor.  Checked with my
favorite
> > > Yama-dealer yesterday, and the corporate folks are NOT authorizing
> > > deposits, so any taken thus far are "wildcat".
> > >
> > > The dealer show was totally without mention of the FJR.  If pressed by
a
> > > dealer, the answer is "no" on future availability.  Yamaha has
> maintained
> > > that position from day one.
> > >
> > > OK, so the choice is not a choice, in my opinion.  If the FJR did
become
> > > available, though, the contrast would be....
> > >
> > > Same price, for all intents and purposes.  Difference in needed cash
> > > outlay is the difference between a nearly decade-old used bike with
> parts
> > > availability problems, and a brand-spanking new one with a warranty.
So
> > > cash out of pocket would be 75-100% more for the FJR.
> > >
> > > Long term interest--bonus goes to the GTS.  In 20 years the FJR will
NOT
> > > be found in any "most significant" lists.
> > >
> > > Really, the question is between the GTS and some other (non-Yamaha)
> sport
> > > tourer, such as Triumph, BMW, Honda, or other.  If you want something
> > > unique, get the GTS.
> > >
> > > Phil
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Bill wrote:
> > >
> > > > My '91 FJ1200 has served me well since I purchased it in '93 but it
is
> > > > getting a little "long in the tooth" with 80,500 miles. I think it's
> > time
> > > > for a change and the GTS is a prime candidate. I have been looking
at
> > them
> > > > for some time now and will be making a change soon. There is a new
> > FJ1300
> > > > coming but at $12,000 (or there abouts) it's out of my range. Would
> > > > appriciate any help or comments from any of you with knowledge about
> the
> > two
> > > > bikes. (How much alike, not alike, etc)
> > >
>

Reply via email to