The difference here is you are quoting what you read in a magazine and I am
telling you what I experienced with the radar gun in my hand.  The number
plate was plastic, and there were no headlight buckets behind it. It was an
R-6 set up for racing that did not even have the stock fairing bracket under
neath but a much reduced size aluminum one. As far as detection range, I
would estimate it at about 1/4 mile. The range of detection was identical to
that of stock R-1's with headlight buckets. Sounds like they are guessing, I
am not. I am using a Stalker Sports Pro Radar gun transmitting on K band.
Trust me on this, I had a speed reading on the motorcycle long before he was
anywhere near close enough to be able to tell I was holding a radar gun if he
did not know I was there. In case you think speed had something to do with
it, like slow speed giving it more time to react, about the first reading I
got was around 100 MPH and it proceeded to climb from there. That means the
entire length of time expiring for radaring was less than 6 seconds. A
detector would have gone off long before I could have picked him up, but do
not bank on the fact that you have to be within 300 feet to be detected. As a
further comment, I have radar'd even more personal watercraft than
motorcycles, which are fiberglass with even less metal showing, and they will
reflect a signal from more than 300 feet also. I will admit that they are
being tested on water and the reflection of the radar off the water may help,
but point being, dont rely on the 300 foot guess.
RSRBOB


In a message dated 1/18/02 12:21:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< Bob, I have to disagree with you on that statement about headlight buckets
 and number plates, but his earlier statement about headlight buckets was
 taken out of context.  Of course, if the number plate was metal, then that
 would be a great signal reflector. >>

Reply via email to