Mikael Djurfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > To me, the name "generalized_vector" feels a bit odd and heavy. > Looking in the dictionaries, it seems like the term "generic_vector" > would be more fitting. What do the native English speakers say?
I would steer clear of "generic", since it has a specific meaning for goops. Shortening to perhaps "general" would read fine to me. Something like "any-vector-ref" may be an option, since there's no such thing as a generalized vector, they're just functions for accessing any vector. Except "any" doesn't read terribly well to me, it's a bit close to srfi-1 `any' for a start. Some other similar word maybe. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
