Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Mikael Djurfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> Well, to me that specific meaning---a function that can operate on any >> of a set of types---is just another example of what we have here: a >> vector that can be any of a set of types, so my view is that its just >> an advantage to use the same term. > > Sounds fair.
I am fine with changing "generalized" to "generic" as well. Mikael, please go ahead, if you want to. -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
