Mikael Djurfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Well, to me that specific meaning---a function that can operate on any > of a set of types---is just another example of what we have here: a > vector that can be any of a set of types, so my view is that its just > an advantage to use the same term.
Sounds fair. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
