In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Han-Wen Nienhuys) writes: > >> Yes, -- FWIW, I warmly recommend darcs, which is much easier to use. > >I don't think there's such a huge difference, especially when looking at >[0]. Additionally, most of the commands shown there now have >"easy-looking" counterparts taken from Bazaar, e.g., `branch', `switch', >etc. Both Arch and Darcs are easy to administrate and deploy. > >Anyway, if we were to choose a DRCS for Guile, I think it'd make sense >to favor the GNU implementation.
This is offtopic, but I think that this is kind of politically motivated reasoning is not in GUILE's best interests. >The changelog entries were in the email that started this thread: ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . :-) Thanks, applied to CVS now. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
