[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Han-Wen Nienhuys) writes: > Yes, -- FWIW, I warmly recommend darcs, which is much easier to use.
I don't think there's such a huge difference, especially when looking at [0]. Additionally, most of the commands shown there now have "easy-looking" counterparts taken from Bazaar, e.g., `branch', `switch', etc. Both Arch and Darcs are easy to administrate and deploy. Anyway, if we were to choose a DRCS for Guile, I think it'd make sense to favor the GNU implementation. > Nitpicks: I'm missing a ChangeLog. The changelog entries were in the email that started this thread: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . :-) > Arguably, you should also add your > name to the contributors list in THANKS. Can you send a patch for > that as well? It occurred to me that I'm already listed there, not in the `contributors' section though---do you want me to move to this category? Thanks, Ludovic. [0] http://darcs.net/manual/node2.html#SECTION00230000000000000000 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
