On Jan 24, 2006, at 16:06, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Han-Wen Nienhuys) writes:
Yes, -- FWIW, I warmly recommend darcs, which is much easier to
use.
I don't think there's such a huge difference, especially when
looking at
[0]. Additionally, most of the commands shown there now have
"easy-looking" counterparts taken from Bazaar, e.g., `branch',
`switch',
etc. Both Arch and Darcs are easy to administrate and deploy.
Anyway, if we were to choose a DRCS for Guile, I think it'd make
sense
to favor the GNU implementation.
This is offtopic, but I think that this is kind of politically
motivated reasoning is not in GUILE's best interests.
The FSF is now running an arch server at savannah, see http://
arch.sv.gnu.org for info.
As for the politics, you may have noticed that GNU is a somewhat
politically motivated project... :-) But I have no idea if the
choice of arch is official, or just what some volunteers were willing
to support; ask RMS if you want to know the official position.
(Personally, my preference would be svn, which I'm using at work, and
svk for associated distributed work, but whatever....)
Ken
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
