Ludovic Courtès schreef:
Hi Han-Wen,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ludovic Courtès schreef:
But please, relax about performance, we still haven't run any meaningful
benchmark. ;-)
btw, is there any news on this patch? I'm quite keen on dumping
LilyPond's Rational class in favor of Scheme rationals, but adding gc
mark functions for that is just too much work; BGC would be a nice
soluiton to this.
Well, no real news. My "not-so-meaningful benchmarks" (running a
loop[*]) reproductively show that "GBGC" is noticeably slower than "real
Guile" (1.5 to 2 times slower).
On larger samples the difference gets smaller.
With a 128mb footprint (GC tree benchmark), the difference is that BGC
is just 23% slower,
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
