Ludovic Courtès schreef:
Well, no real news. My "not-so-meaningful benchmarks" (running a
loop[*]) reproductively show that "GBGC" is noticeably slower than "real
Guile" (1.5 to 2 times slower).
the following options turn on generational GC
GC_enable_incremental ();
GC_time_limit = GC_TIME_UNLIMITED;
with this, I get (very) slight performance improvement. For the 32mb
tree test, BGC is 40% slower, for the 128mb tree, it's 31%
(disregard the previous figure of 23 %, it was an error in calculation,
it should have been 33 %)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
