Roel Janssen <r...@gnu.org> writes:
>> > +(define-public r-bisquerna >> > + (package >> > + (name "r-bisquerna") >> > + (version "1.0.4") >> > + (source (origin >> > + (method url-fetch) >> > + (uri (cran-uri "BisqueRNA" version)) >> > + (sha256 >> > + (base32 >> > + "01g34n87ml7n3pck77497ddgbv3rr5p4153ac8ninpgjijlm3jw >> > 2")))) >> >> Why is this in (gnu packages bioinformatics) and not in (gnu packages >> cran)? > > It seemed so "bioinformatics"-specific. But you're right, it's a CRAN > package, so that may be a better fit. Shall I move it to CRAN? If you have time to do that, yes please. Some time ago I started a half-hearted migration of R packages from (gnu packages bioinformatics) to (gnu packages cran) and (gnu packages bioconductor). It’s not supremely important, but I think in the long term we’d like to have CRAN things in (gnu packages cran) and Bioconductor things in (gnu packages bioconductor), because it’s deliciously unsurprising. :) >> > + (synopsis "Decomposition of Bulk Expression with Single-Cell >> > Sequencing") >> >> Please use lowercase where it would be normally used. > > My mistake. I will take better care of this in the future. Thank you! Perhaps we could sprinkle some smarts over the CRAN importer to do this automatically, but with R packages we often have names of methods that should be upper case (like “Bayes*” or “SNPs”), so I have shied away from developing heuristics for that. Thanks for adding more R packages! -- Ricardo
