zimoun <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 13:30, Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> wrote: > >> > It seemed so "bioinformatics"-specific. But you're right, it's a CRAN >> > package, so that may be a better fit. Shall I move it to CRAN? >> >> If you have time to do that, yes please. Some time ago I started a >> half-hearted migration of R packages from (gnu packages bioinformatics) >> to (gnu packages cran) and (gnu packages bioconductor). It’s not >> supremely important, but I think in the long term we’d like to have CRAN >> things in (gnu packages cran) and Bioconductor things in (gnu packages >> bioconductor), because it’s deliciously unsurprising. :) > > I agree. And it is also on my TODO but the Copyright lines lead to a > boring task. :-) It becomes a little easier with “git log --grep=package-name”. > Does it make sense to add a subsection to: > https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/guix.html#Packaging-Guidelines > about R packages? Perhaps not. I think it may not be necessary because we don’t have that many people contributing R packages to us and the manual already has a lot of information that might be overwhelming. So far we’ve been doing fine without it. It’s a really minor point, in my opinion. -- Ricardo
