On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Alex Kost <[email protected]> wrote: > Federico Beffa (2015-08-01 19:18 +0300) wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose to change the name of package 'haskell-mode' >> to 'emacs-haskell-mode' as we recently started doing for emacs >> packages. >> >> WDYT? > > I agree on this, but I don't understand the convention of naming emacs > packages. What about "geiser", "emms", "magit", "paredit"? I have a > feeling they shouldn't be renamed into "emacs-geiser", … but I can't > explain why.
The discussion on naming was very quick: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-06/msg00309.html >From my point of view, if we want to be consistent we should use the same prefix for all packages providing Emacs libraries/extensions. Choices based on feelings are just going to make things confusing. Fede
