Federico Beffa (2015-08-03 10:50 +0300) wrote: > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Alex Kost <[email protected]> wrote: >> Federico Beffa (2015-08-01 19:18 +0300) wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to propose to change the name of package 'haskell-mode' >>> to 'emacs-haskell-mode' as we recently started doing for emacs >>> packages. >>> >>> WDYT? >> >> I agree on this, but I don't understand the convention of naming emacs >> packages. What about "geiser", "emms", "magit", "paredit"? I have a >> feeling they shouldn't be renamed into "emacs-geiser", … but I can't >> explain why. > > The discussion on naming was very quick: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-06/msg00309.html > > From my point of view, if we want to be consistent we should use the > same prefix for all packages providing Emacs libraries/extensions. > Choices based on feelings are just going to make things confusing.
I was confused because you proposed to rename only 'haskell-mode'. I think it is better to rename all emacs packages in once. -- Alex
