Leo Famulari (2016-05-20 16:38 +0300) wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 02:02:41PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> The patch LGTM, but since this is a full-rebuild change, I prefer keep >> it for the next core-updates cycle. Let’s try not to forget about it. > > Should we create "core-updates-next" or something like that? I have a > few other patches I don't want to forget about either.
Good idea! I agree. -- Alex
