Ludovic Courtès (2016-05-22 00:02 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost <[email protected]> skribis: > >> Leo Famulari (2016-05-20 16:38 +0300) wrote: >> >>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 02:02:41PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >>>> The patch LGTM, but since this is a full-rebuild change, I prefer keep >>>> it for the next core-updates cycle. Let’s try not to forget about it. >>> >>> Should we create "core-updates-next" or something like that? I have a >>> few other patches I don't want to forget about either. >> >> Good idea! I agree. > > OK, go ahead then. :-) We’ll rename it to ‘core-updates’ when the > current one is deleted.
I went ahead. Leo, now it's you turn to commit your patches to "core-updates-next". I based it on master, not sure if it should be based on "core-updates", but anyway, it's done already :-) -- Alex
