On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:28:14AM +0900, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > I would tend to think of ‘master’ as the branch for non-functional > changes like this. But the key is to make sure such wide changes are > kept in a single branch to avoid merge issues as you wrote. > > WDYT?
To clarify, for this case I think it's not a problem to make the change. At most it's only ~40 packages, and that's only ~1% of all our packages :)
