On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:57:47PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Yeah, seems hard to exploit. Apparently even if we’re not using systemd
> activations we could be vulnerable, because it’s about how specific
> messages are processed, IIUC.
> > What do you think? Should we update this on core-updates?
> I think so.
Okay. Just to clarify, this will trigger >1000 rebuilds.
> > Should we graft it on master?
> Unless there are possible ABI incompatibilies, it probably doesn’t hurt
> to do that.
According to the dbus README, the offer a stable ABI within each stable
But, I found that the regular approach to grafting does not work for our
dbus package. Presumably, it's because (gnu packages glib) exports dbus
before defining it.