Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> skribis:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:57:47PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Yeah, seems hard to exploit. Apparently even if we’re not using systemd
>> activations we could be vulnerable, because it’s about how specific
>> messages are processed, IIUC.
>> > What do you think? Should we update this on core-updates?
>> I think so.
> Okay. Just to clarify, this will trigger >1000 rebuilds.
Well the answer was valid on Oct. 10th ;-), but at this point of the
build progress I agree that it’s kinda problematic would probably
What are your thoughts?
>> > Should we graft it on master?
>> Unless there are possible ABI incompatibilies, it probably doesn’t hurt
>> to do that.
> According to the dbus README, the offer a stable ABI within each stable
> release series:
> But, I found that the regular approach to grafting does not work for our
> dbus package. Presumably, it's because (gnu packages glib) exports dbus
> before defining it.
The #:export at the top shouldn’t make any difference. In what way does
it not work? :-)
Could it be an instance of <http://bugs.gnu.org/24418>?