Hi Efraim,
Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> writes:
> I merged master into staging today and got the following chart:
>
> | architecture | berlin | hydra |
> +--------------+--------+-------+
> | x86_64 | 42.2% | 78.8% |
> | i686 | 28.2% | 64.3% |
> | aarch64 | 0% | 23.0% |
> | armhf | 16.8% | 50.4% |
>
> but compared to master:
>
> | architecture | berlin | hydra |
> +--------------+--------+-------+
> | x86_64 | 57.5% | 91.9% |
> | i686 | 44.4% | 77.8% |
> | aarch64 | 0% | 41.8% |
> | armhf | 30.3% | 69.6% |
Something looks wrong here, because Hydra has never supported aarch64,
i.e. it does not create jobs for that system and has never been
connected to an aarch64 build slave, so I don't see how it could
possibly have more than 0% coverage on that system.
> So I think I'd like to see a comparison on hydra of staging vs master
> and if it's good enough we go ahead and merge
I just asked Hydra to produce another evaluation of 'staging'. When it
has finished doing so, we'll know more.
Thanks!
Mark
